Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Karen National Union Statement on SPDC Parliament & Government

KNU Statement on SPDC Parliament & Government

08 Feb 2011


1. In May 2008, the SPDC1 military dictatorship held a rigged referendum on the State Constitution, which was drafted by the SPDC-selected members of the National Convention. The Constitution gives 25% of the seats in all elected bodies to military representatives and all important ministries are to be headed military men.
2. Again, on November 7, 2010, the SPDC held a thoroughly manipulated general election, designed to give a landslide victory to its puppet party, the USDA2. The election followed over 20 years of brutal suppression and marginalization of the NLD3, ethnic nationality parties and democracy activists through unfair orders, laws and the use of violence.
3. The parliament recently convened by the SPDC under its 2008 State Constitution is nothing but a rubber-stamp parliament, and the government to be formed will be a puppet under the complete control of the military dictatorship. The majority of members of the government will be ex-military men in civilian clothes, and this new government will follow the same principles, policies and programs the military dictatorship has followed.
4. The country will continue to suffer from poverty, instability and chaotic conditions as the military dictatorship and its cronies continue to loot the state’s coffers and natural resources and perpetuate oppressive rule. The dictatorship will continue to allocate more of the state budget to its military apparatus to eliminate the resistance forces of the ethnic nationalities and control the restive population, rather than working through political means to promote national reconciliation, durable peace and stability.
5. In spite of years of urging by the international community and the peace and justice loving countries of the world, the military dictatorship continues to rely on violence, oppression, greed and aggression to control the people of Burma. The people of Burma, the ethnic nationalities and the international community are not deceived by the dictatorship’s attempt to hide behind its rubberstamp parliament and puppet government with a civilian façade.
6. For the above reasons, we, the KNU, reject and denounce the military dictatorship’s parliament and the government that will be formed in the near future. We call on the international community and the peace and justice loving countries of the world to also reject and denounce the new parliament and government.
7. We further call on the international community and the peace and justice loving countries of the world to continue pressing the SPDC to resolve the country’s problems peacefully. The SPDC must engage in a dialogue with democratic and ethnic nationality forces; stop its war of aggression against the ethnic nationalities, particularly against ethnic civilians; and release immediately and unconditionally the more than 2000 political prisoners.
Supreme Headquarters
Karen National Union

 

 

Thursday, February 3, 2011

UK House of Commons Hansard Burma EU Action Burma Foreign Investment

Written Answers to Questions
Monday 31 January 2011
Foreign and Commonwealth Office


Burma: EU Action

Valerie Vaz:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had at EU level on the future of targeted EU sanctions on Burma. [36786]

Mr Jeremy Browne:
EU Foreign Ministers last discussed Burma at the November 2010 Foreign Affairs Council, attended by the Minister for Europe, my right hon. Friend the Member for Aylesbury (Mr Lidington). There was agreement on the need for caution in response to recent events, including flawed elections and the release of Aung San Suu Kyi. Longstanding EU policy is that sanctions will only be eased in response to progress on the ground. Official level discussions on the annual renewal of the EU Council Decision on Burma have since begun in Brussels.


Burma: Foreign Investment

Valerie Vaz:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what estimate he has made of the inward investment in Burma made via British Overseas Territories in each of the last three years. [36842]

Mr Jeremy Browne
: The UK Government does not hold information on the amount or destination of outward foreign direct investment via the British Overseas Territories.

Ensuring that the Overseas Territories comply with relevant UK international obligations is a priority for the Government. This includes giving effect to international sanctions, including the EU's targeted restrictive measures against the Burmese regime. We have seen no evidence to date to suggest that there is direct investment in Burma via the Overseas Territories that is contrary to existing sanctions.

www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/.../110131w0001.htm

UK House of Commons Hansard DKBA Thailand Charge d'affaires

Written Answers to Questions
Monday 31 January 2011
Foreign and Commonwealth Office


Jo Swinson:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent reports he has received on attacks against the Democratic Karen Buddhist Army in Myawaddy, Karen state, Burma. [36815]

Mr Jeremy Browne:
Fighting between troops and ethnic Karen rebels close to the Thai-Burma border has continued since November 2010 and resulted in thousands of Burmese refugees fleeing into Thailand. Regime attempts to force ethnic ceasefire groups to join a national Border Guard Force in addition to restrictive and deeply flawed elections in November, have further heightened tensions.


31 Jan 2011 : Column 496W

Our chargé d'affaires in Bangkok raised this issue with the Thai Foreign Minister on 19 January 2011 and with the Army commander and governor of the affected area of Thailand during a visit to Mae La refugee camp, in Mae Sot, on 17 January.

www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/.../110131w0001.htm

UK House of Commons Hansard Burma Kachin Relocation Myitsone Dam

Written Answers to Questions
Monday 31 January 2011
Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Jo Swinson:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representation he has received on the compatibility with the Rome Statute on forced population transfer of the proposed relocation of ethnic Kachin people in advance of the construction of the Myitsone dam, Kachin state, Burma. [36812]

Mr Jeremy Browne:
The Government have not received any such representations. However, we remain deeply concerned about the human rights and environmental impact of the construction of the Myitsone dam. We understand that construction of the dam will forcibly displace around 15,000 people. In addition, reports suggest the construction of the dam is causing flooding and water shortages, threatening the livelihoods of thousands of people. Our embassy in Rangoon is working with local groups to raise awareness of the situation and staff are scheduled to travel to the affected area shortly.

www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/.../110131w0001.htm

UN 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) too late for Cyclone Nargis and the Karen

BAN URGES IMPLEMENTATION OF ‘RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT’ – BY FORCE IF NEEDED
New York, Feb 2 2011 6:05PM
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said today the United Nations must perform its duty to protect peoples from man-made or natural calamities more effectively, stressing that when sovereign States fail in the task the international community must step in, with force if needed.

“The founders of the United Nations understood that sovereignty confers responsibility, a responsibility to ensure protection of human beings from want, from war, and from repression,” he declared in the Cyril Foster <"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=5072">lecture at Oxford University, as prepared for delivery. “When that responsibility is not discharged, the international community is morally obliged to consider its duty to act in the service of human protection.”

Mr. Ban has made the “responsibility to protect” a hallmark of his tenure, most recently telling a seminar on genocide prevention in December that prevention is a global responsibility – when States fail to protect their populations, the international community must act.

Today he noted that at the 2005 UN World Summit, heads of State and Government embraced the responsibility to protect by preventing genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, including their incitement.

“The growing political acceptance of the responsibility to protect speaks well for the future of human protection,” he said. “Prior to my assumption of the office of Secretary-General, I made a pledge to turn those words into deeds. Some Member States have treated the 2005 document as the end, not the beginning, not least because of apprehensions about its implications.

“Those States would keep the bar so high as to make the application of the responsibility to protect virtually impossible.

“My doctrine envisages that our efforts to prevent these awful crimes rest on three pillars: first, state responsibility; second, international responsibility to help states to succeed; and third, timely and decisive response should national authorities manifestly fail to protect, including under Chapter VII, if the Security Council deems such steps necessary.”

Chapter VII of the UN Charter allows the Council to use force in the face of a threat to peace or aggression, taking “such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security,” including blockades and other operations by the forces of Member States.

Mr. Ban began his lecture on a personal note, recalling his experiences as a child witnessing the ravages of the Korean War. “I learned about hunger, poverty and displacement in the ultimate classroom ¬– personal experience,” he said. “Against all odds, the United Nations came to our rescue. It fed my family and my people; it helped rebuild my country. It continues to offer hope to our troubled peninsula. That quest, like many others, remains unfulfilled.

“But I often wonder how many children, in similar straits, ask the same questions today that I did then: Is the world listening? Will help arrive in time? Who will be there for me and my family?”

He focussed on three areas: human protection in conflict and complex emergencies where the UN serves as fire-fighter, such as peacekeeping and disaster relief; prevention “so that fires do not happen in the first place;” and the development of legal institutions promoting accountability.

He noted that peacekeepers have been entrusted with growing responsibilities not only to keep armies at bay, but to protect civilians who are prey to militias and other combatants, a task implying mobility and, in difficult terrain, air mobility.

“As we repeatedly pointed out in Sudan (where the UN is involved on two fronts, in the south and the western Darfur region), if we do not have helicopters, we are only able to field a static force. That radically undermines our capacity to protect civilians,” he said.

“Securing the required resources and troops has consumed much of my energy. That experience underscores what can happen when Member States fail to provide the resources necessary to carry out the Council’s mandates.”

He also referred to Côte d’Ivoire, where former President Laurent Gbagbo clings to power despite losing elections, noting that the UN mandate there encompasses both guaranteeing the electoral process and protecting recently elected officials and vulnerable populations.

“It is a task that must be performed in the face of direct attacks, harassment and provocation,” he said. “Undoubtedly, the UN needs to perform its protection duties more effectively. Our peacekeepers are upgrading their methods of patrolling and systems of communication to cover vulnerable communities more adequately in the most difficult terrain.”

Turning to prevention, he noted that in 2010 alone, the UN supported 34 different mediation, facilitation and dialogue efforts, including easing the crisis in Kyrgyzstan and keeping the transition to democracy on track in Guinea.

On the third issue – an end to impunity – Mr. Ban cited the UN courts trying perpetrators for gross human rights violations in Rwanda and former Yugoslavia, and stressed that “it is essential that we stand firm in support” of the tribunal set up to try suspects in the 2005 murders of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and 22 others.

Lebanon’s government, led by Mr. Hariri’s son, Saad, collapsed last month after 11 Hizbollah and allied ministers resigned, reportedly over the Government’s refusal to cease cooperation with the tribunal, which the media says was about to indict Hizbollah members for the murders.

“We must ask ourselves: Have our strategies and our operational practice on the ground kept pace with the ever-increasing demand for human protection?” Mr. Ban said in conclusion. “We must concede that our words are ahead of our deeds. But I am convinced this is a challenge we can meet. Momentum is on our side.

“What is required is shared responsibility between Member States and the leadership of the UN. Together, we can answer the cry of that child at the beginning of my lecture, somewhere caught in the crossfire and wondering: Can the world hear my call? Who will help me and my family?”
________________
For more details go to UN News Centre at http://www.un.org/news